IV.
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION FOR EMPLOYEES ON LEAVE AND FORMER EMPLOYEES
A.
Health and Disability Insurance
B.
Bonuses and Promotions
C.
Reductions in Force and Layoffs
IV.
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION FOR EMPLOYEES ON LEAVE AND FORMER EMPLOYEES
The ADA requires employers
to provide accommodations to ensure that employees with disabilities
receive equal benefits of employment. For employees on leave and former
employees, benefits of employment may include health and disability
insurance, job protection, and bonuses and promotions.
A. Health
and Disability Insurance
1. Does the ADA apply
to employer-sponsored benefits such as health insurance and short
and long term disability?
According to the EEOC,
the interplay between the nondiscrimination principles of the
ADA and employer-sponsored benefits such as health insurance and short
and long term disability can be very complex. The EEOC has two publications
that may help employers understand how the ADA applies to employer-sponsored
benefits:
Interim Enforcement
Guidance On the Application of the Americans With Disabilities Act
of 1990 to Disability-Based Distinctions In Employer Provided Health
Insurance at http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/health.html.
Employee Benefits at http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/benefits.html.
2. When employers offer
long term disability insurance, can they condition the receipt of
payments on termination of employment? Does this potentially violate
the ADA's requirement that employers consider holding jobs for people
who take leave as an accommodation (assuming the employee has a disability
and plans to return to work at some point)?
Generally this practice
does not violate the ADA. Long term disability is a benefit of employment
that employers are free to offer or not. As such, employers set the
parameters of the benefit. An employer might violate the ADA if the
employer's purpose was to evade its obligations under the ADA, but
that would be difficult to prove since the employer did not have to
offer the benefit in the first place.
3. Can an employer terminate
or reduce an individual's health insurance benefits because he or
she is working fewer hours due to a disability?
Yes, according to the EEOC.
The ADA does not prohibit the adoption of health insurance eligibility
requirements that do not discriminate on the basis of disability,
as long as such requirements are applied in the same manner to all
employees. A requirement that employees work a certain number of hours
to remain eligible for health insurance benefits does not discriminate
on the basis of disability. It limits both individuals with and without
disabilities. Thus, for example, an employee who works reduces hours
for some other reason, such as attending school, would also be subject
to a reduction or loss of health insurance benefits.
From an EEOC informal guidance
letter dated January 4, 1995.
B. Bonuses
and Promotions
If an employer bases
bonuses or promotions on employee performance records and attendance,
can the employer penalize an employee for work missed during leave
taken as a reasonable accommodation?
No, according to the EEOC,
to do so would be retaliation for the employee's use of a reasonable
accommodation to which he/she is entitled under the law. Moreover,
such punishment would make the leave an ineffective accommodation,
thus making an employer liable for failing to provide a reasonable
accommodation.
From Reasonable Accommodation
and Undue Hardship under the ADA, question 19, at http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/accommodation.html.
C. Reductions
in Force and Layoffs
1. Does the ADA protect
employees with disabilities from termination during a reduction in
force or from being laid off when business is slow?
Although the ADA protects
individuals with disabilities against discrimination on the basis
of disability, employees with disabilities are not protected against
non-discriminatory layoffs. When deciding to terminate or layoff employees,
employers need to make sure that their decisions are based on business
needs, rather than on a desire to get rid of employees with disabilities.
For example, employers can base their layoff decisions on such non-discriminatory
criteria as productivity, seniority, or job category. However, if
an employer bases its layoff decisions on productivity of employees,
it cannot penalize employees for accommodations that were provided
under the ADA. The EEOC gives the following example:
Company X is having a reduction-in-force.
The company decides that any employee who has missed more than four
weeks in the past year will be terminated. An employee took five weeks
of leave for treatment of his disability. The company cannot count
those five weeks in determining whether to terminate this employee.
From Reasonable Accommodation
and Undue Hardship under the ADA, question 19, at http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/accommodation.html.
2. Are former employees
covered by the ADA?
Former employees are protected
by the ADA when they are subjected to discrimination arising from
the former employment relationship. For example, an employer cannot
release confidential medical information about a former employee.
From Threshold Issues
(EEOC Guidance) at http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/threshold.html.